Housing Review · correspondence
The Ministry replied about Denman Bylaws 260 and 264.
On 2 October 2026, senior planner Kelsey-Rae Russell answered Tony Aly's 17 September questions about the proposed Denman bylaws. Her full reply appears below, as supplied by Tony. It is the Ministry's account of its role and the file's status on that date.
What the reply establishes
- Bylaw 260 had received third reading and a public hearing, but had not yet been referred to the Minister when the Ministry replied. The reply does not give a date when either bylaw was submitted to the Islands Trust Executive Committee.
- Bylaw 260 cannot take effect without ministerial approval. The separate land-use Bylaw 264 needs Executive Committee approval and final adoption by the local trust committee; the Ministry says it does not require ministerial approval here.
- The Ministry calls its July comments preliminary and advisory. It did not find the draft legally compliant or noncompliant, or recommend that it proceed.
- The Ministry will not assess the present draft's compliance in this correspondence. It says the local trust committee is responsible for its planning decision and that ministerial approval would not validate a bylaw against a legal challenge.
Two different 20-year requirements
The reply points to page 5 of the Province's guidance: the deadline to update an OCP to accommodate the housing needs report's 20-year total applies to municipalities, not the Islands Trust. That matches Local Government Act s. 473.1(3) and (5), which name municipal councils. Section 473(1)(a) separately requires an OCP to include statements and map designations respecting the approximate location, amount, type and density of residential development needed over at least 20 years. Section 473.1(2) requires consideration of the latest housing needs report when developing an OCP or amending specified housing provisions. The Ministry gives no opinion here on whether Denman's draft meets those provisions.
The full reply
Received 2 October 2026 from the Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs, Land Use, Planning and Regional Impacts Branch. Tony supplied the email body for publication. Paragraphs and wording below are reproduced as supplied; the email interface header is omitted. The Ministry's words end at the signature.
Dear Tony Aly:
Thank you for your email of September 17, 2026, addressed to the Land Use, Planning and Regional Impacts Branch, regarding Denman Island Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 260 and Land Use Bylaw No. 264, as well as questions regarding the Local Government Act and Islands Trust Act.
Local governments, including the Islands Trust, are established to provide services and regulate the development of communities by and on behalf of the people who live in them. As such, local governments have a level of autonomy within their jurisdiction and in meeting their statutory responsibilities, and their elected officials are accountable through democratic processes for their direction and decisions. This extends to setting the vision for land use and development and ensuring public engagement and other procedures are carried out in alignment with the Local Government Act and, in the case of the Islands Trust, the Islands Trust Act, as well.
The Islands Trust has legal authority and responsibility for making decisions on behalf of island communities and for ensuring their decision-making processes conform to principles of good practice and all legal requirements. When a local government’s jurisdiction or adherence to due process is in question, it is the role of the courts to make that determination, not the provincial government.
Unlike most local governments, OCP bylaws adopted by Islands Trust local trust committees require approval from the Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs before they may be adopted (however, local trust committee land use bylaws are not subject to this requirement). Under the statutory process, ministerial approval is required before an OCP bylaw can proceed to final adoption by a local trust committee.
The draft of Denman Island OCP Bylaw No. 260 has received third reading, and a public hearing was held. The bylaw has not yet been referred and is therefore not currently before the Minister for a decision. Both the current provincial election period and the upcoming local government election may affect administrative timelines and decision-making processes for this bylaw.
From time to time, Local Trust Committees may seek feedback from Ministry staff on draft bylaws prior to referral for ministerial approval. Ministry staff provided preliminary comments on draft versions of the Denman Island bylaws in July 2026. Such comments are advisory in nature and are intended to assist local governments in considering legislative requirements and procedural matters. They do not constitute a legal review of a bylaw, a determination that a bylaw complies with all legislative requirements, or a recommendation regarding whether a bylaw ought to proceed.
The Ministry's role is distinct from that of the Local Trust Committee. Determining whether a proposed bylaw is appropriate for a community is fundamentally the responsibility of locally elected officials. Neither staff review nor ministerial approval can validate a bylaw or preclude legal challenge. The Minister's role is limited to approving, refusing to approve, or delaying a decision on a bylaw referred for approval under the Islands Trust Act. The Minister cannot dictate or amend the text of a bylaw.
The Ministry is not in a position to comment on the contents of future versions of the proposed bylaws, whether any deficiencies have been addressed, or whether a future version would satisfy particular statutory requirements. The Minister's decision is made on the basis of the specific bylaw and information before the Minister at that time. It would not be appropriate to comment on how the Minister may approach a future decision on bylaws that have not yet been referred. Questions concerning the current content of draft bylaws are best directed to the Islands Trust. Questions regarding bylaws on Denman Island can be directed to northinfo@islandstrust.bc.ca. Questions regarding draft Denman Island OCP Bylaw No. 260 can be directed to Narissa Chadwick, Island Planner, at nchadwick@islandstrust.bc.ca or 250-405-5189.
Several of your questions seek interpretation of specific provisions of the Local Government Act and related provisions respecting housing needs reports and OCPs. The Ministry is unable to provide legal advice or interpret legislation. For this reason, I cannot comment on whether a particular bylaw, housing needs report, local trust committee action, or planning process complies with a specific statutory provision, nor can I provide an opinion regarding how those provisions may apply in a particular circumstance. Similarly, the Ministry is not able to confirm whether particular actions taken by a local trust committee satisfy statutory obligations in relation to housing needs reports or OCPs. Questions raised regarding the procedural or legal legitimacy of local bylaws would need to be resolved through judicial review. You may wish to seek independent legal advice, as the Ministry cannot assess specific details or provide guidance on individual situations.
More generally, the Local Government Act contains requirements respecting housing needs reports, the consideration of housing needs information in planning processes, and the content of official community plans. Responsibility for preparing reports, considering those reports, and developing or amending planning documents rests with the applicable local authority in accordance with the legislation. In the case of the Islands Trust, those local authorities are the local trust committees. The schedule for the completion of housing needs reports is outlined in section 585.31(3) of the Local Government Act. For more information on housing needs reports and the Province’s planning requirements around housing, please see the Proactive Planning webpage and Proactive Planning Guidance. Please note on page 5 of the Proactive Planning Guidance, it states that only municipalities (not regional districts or the Islands Trust) are required to update their OCPs to include statements and map designations to meet anticipated housing needs over at least 20 years, as identified in a housing needs report.
Regarding your question on the applicability of various sections of the Local Government Act to local trust committees, Section 29 of the Islands Trust Act broadly outlines the parts of the Local Government Act that apply to the Islands Trust with regards to land use and subdivision regulation. With regards to your question on transit-oriented areas, all transit-oriented areas are listed in Order-In-Council 678-2023. None appear to be located within the Islands Trust’s jurisdiction. More information about transit-oriented areas can be found in the Provincial Policy Manual for Transit Oriented Areas.
This response is intended to provide general information only. It does not constitute legal advice, does not express a view on the merits of any proposed bylaw, and should not be interpreted as presupposing, constraining, or fettering any future decision of the Minister regarding any bylaw that may be referred for approval.
Sincerely,
Kelsey-Rae Russell
Senior Planner
Land Use, Planning, and Regional Impacts
Local Government Division
Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs
What remains open
The reply does not say when the Executive Committee received either bylaw, whether the Trust's revised text or map answers the July comments, or whether the 2025 housing needs report was formally received by each local trust committee. It gives no finding that a law was broken. The one-month Executive Committee decision period starts when the Trust secretary receives a submitted bylaw, not at third reading; see Islands Trust Act ss. 22 and 27.
The earlier 21 July 2026 Ministry referral comment and the committee's recorded 24 August discussionremain separate primary records. The July comment was advisory; the October reply does not erase what staff wrote or what the committee voted to delete.